<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Guéguen, Author at Brussels Express</title>
	<atom:link href="https://brussels-express.eu/author/dgueguen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://brussels-express.eu/author/dgueguen/</link>
	<description>Brussels daily online news platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 09:52:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>fr-FR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Is the famous Portrait de Madame Stuart Merrill a real or fake Jean Delville?</title>
		<link>https://brussels-express.eu/madame-stuart-merrill/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Guéguen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 09:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cult'Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Delville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brussels-express.eu/?p=3544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Most Belgians are no longer aware, but in the late 19th and early 20th century – that brilliant fin de</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://brussels-express.eu/madame-stuart-merrill/">Is the famous Portrait de Madame Stuart Merrill a real or fake Jean Delville?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://brussels-express.eu">Brussels Express</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Belgians are no longer aware, but in the late 19<sup>th</sup> and early 20<sup>th</sup> century – that brilliant <i>fin de siècle</i> period – Belgium was a world leader in art, along with France. Jean Deville, the figurehead of symbolism worldwide, remains an artist whose works we know well (e.g. <i>The School of Plato</i> at Orsay, <i>The Love of Souls</i> in the Musée d’Ixelles), but whose life and even name are less familiar.</p>
<p><b>The discovery of <i>The Man and the Crows </i>in 2016 generates a buzz</b></p>
<p>At the beginning of 2016, Jean Delville created a stir in the Belgian media when an unknown work of his, <i>L’Homme aux corbeaux </i>(translated as <i>The Man and the Crows</i>), neglected in the archives of the Bibliothéque royale, was found. Articles, TV programs, an exhibition in the Musée fin-de-siècle…Delville and his <i>The Man and the Crows </i>were on the front pages.</p>
<p><a href="https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Le-portrait-de-Madame-Stuart-Merrill.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3545" src="https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Le-portrait-de-Madame-Stuart-Merrill.png" alt="Le portrait de Madame Stuart Merrill" width="532" height="659" srcset="https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Le-portrait-de-Madame-Stuart-Merrill.png 532w, https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Le-portrait-de-Madame-Stuart-Merrill-242x300.png 242w" sizes="(max-width: 532px) 100vw, 532px" /></a></p>
<p>A few months later, Editions Liénart published<i> Jean Delville: la contre-histoire </i>(now available in English as <i>Jean Delville: The True Story</i>). Relying on previously unknown primary sources, the book uncovers the real life of this great artist, who until then was cloaked in a sort of ‘official truth’, far removed from the genuine truth.</p>
<p>This first biography of Jean Delville restores context to his esoteric involvement with the Freemasons and the theosophists, whom he represented in Belgium, and explains why, following the failure of the ‘New Christ’ Krishnamurti, Delville had a burn-out, left his family and settled in Mons in 1932 with a young woman.</p>
<p>The official history claims that Delville produced nothing of value during the Mons years – an excessive statement. But thanks to the documents and works discovered during the preparation of this book, unknown Delville treasures have been revealed, in particular his very strong and remarkable attraction to art deco, an influence no-one knew about before.</p>
<p><b><i>Portrait of Mrs Stuart Merrill</i>: painted in 1892 or 1944?</b></p>
<p>During the years of the Second World War, a young man helped Deville in his daily life. His name was René Harvent and he became a well-known sculptor. Harvent kept large archives of Delville works, archives that were gradually sold to various dealers and collectors during the 2000s.</p>
<p>At the beginning of the 1970s, several books revived interest in the famous Belgian symbolist period, notably the renowned <i>Le symbolisme belge </i>(<i>Belgian Symbolism</i>)<i> </i>by Francine-Claire Legrand. These publications devoted many pages to one of Delville’s major works, the <i>Portrait of Mrs Stuart Merrill</i>, sold at Sotheby’s in New York, then at Christie’s in London, and finally purchased in 1998 by our Musée Royal des Beaux-Arts.</p>
<p>The work is dated 1892, a fact apparently undisputed, although René Harvent wrote that he saw with his own eyes Delville create this painting in Mons in 1944. He claims he remembers it very well, as the Allied bombers were flying overhead on their way to Germany. In his records, Harvent sets out convincing arguments to confirm this new dating.</p>
<p>The question of whether the <i>Portrait of Mrs Stuart Merrill </i>dates from 1892 or 1944 is far from trivial: if the second date in the right one – which I personally believe is the case – it means Delville’s whole oeuvre will have to be revisited and, to use the modern term, upgraded.</p>
<p>Despite the discovery of <i>The Man and the Crows </i>making headlines, the revelation of a doubt about the dating of one of Delville’s three most famous works has not been commented on at all, even though <i>Jean Delville: The True Story </i>is being widely distributed by Gallimard. No comment from the Musées Royaux, nor from their chief curator Michel Draguet. Are they trying to avoid uncomfortable questions about the purchase of a major painting whose signature may be partially false? Or are they too lazy to check if the paper and colour pencils used date from the late 19<sup>th</sup> or mid 20<sup>th</sup> century? It should not be very difficult to give an answer. We are expecting one.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://brussels-express.eu/madame-stuart-merrill/">Is the famous Portrait de Madame Stuart Merrill a real or fake Jean Delville?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://brussels-express.eu">Brussels Express</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The European Parliament and the Wiertz Museum. Win-win or win-lose?</title>
		<link>https://brussels-express.eu/european-parliament-wiertz-museum-win-win-win-lose/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Guéguen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Brussels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cult'Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://brussels-express.eu/?p=847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember Antoine Wiertz? For the honest European, Belgian fin de siècle art can be summed up in three</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://brussels-express.eu/european-parliament-wiertz-museum-win-win-win-lose/">The European Parliament and the Wiertz Museum. Win-win or win-lose?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://brussels-express.eu">Brussels Express</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><strong>Does anyone remember Antoine Wiertz?</strong> For the honest European, Belgian fin de siècle art can be summed up in three names: Ensor, Rops and Khnopff. But not Wiertz! What a pity, because Wiertz was a pioneer of symbolist art, a mysterious and fertile period including among its ranks prestigious figures like Odilon Redon, Munch, Böcklin, von Stuck and Whistler. The painter’s studio, converted into a Museum on the street that bears his name, is also very important for art-lovers. During its golden age – between 1885 and 1914 – the Léopold quarter housed more than 30 artists’ studios.</p>
<p>One after another, these studios have been chipped away by the buildings of the European quarter. Only the Wiertz Museum and the Marcel Hastir studio on Rue du Commerce have escaped destruction, but then at the beginning of this year we learned that the Wiertz Museum has been acquired by the European Parliament.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-849" src="https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Musée-Wiertz-.jpg" alt="Musée Wiertz" width="1200" height="803" srcset="https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Musée-Wiertz-.jpg 1200w, https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Musée-Wiertz--300x201.jpg 300w, https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Musée-Wiertz--768x514.jpg 768w, https://brussels-express.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Musée-Wiertz--1024x685.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px" /></p>
<h2 class="sous-titre">Integrating art into European culture or using spaces for cynical opportunism?</h2>
<p>Let’s be honest: how many people visit the Wiertz Museum every year? Very few, despite his importance as an artist and the impressive beauty of the space, because the Belgian authorities are skilled in ignoring their national art. They show no pride in it, fail to promote it, even letting the rain into their museums. So why should we be ashamed?</p>
<p>This is what certain senior officials in the European Parliament should have asked themselves. Leaving the studio and works of Wiertz to their fate, they have seized the adjacent building via a 50- year lease for a price of €1, with renovation at their expense. The question is this: why did they acquire it? Create a synergy between the studio and the building? Put the building to new use, thus increasing the appeal of the studio? Set up a ‘cultural’ European space within the building? In truth, we don’t know, because the deal appears to have been done in the utmost secrecy. Several representatives of the Ixelles Commune contacted by us were not aware of it, and neither were any directors of the National Museums. This lack of transparency gives rise to deep suspicions.</p>
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p>For the European Parliament, finding new premises and spaces seems to be a growing leitmotif, as if its poor current performance paradoxically justifies more staff and more offices. Or perhaps, behind this decision, there is a motivation to find replacement property for when the renovation (or even re- building) of the Brussels hemicycle and premises, officially recognised as obsolescent, begins. Here as well, we see such opacity and contempt for the citizen.</p>
<p>What does the city of Strasbourg think about this? On its side, it is currently preparing for provisional or permanent housing of its EP services, which will be affected by the restoration works in Brussels.</p>
<p>It is clear that the more you talk about transparency, the less transparent you are and the more you create confusion, mistrust and ulterior motives. This comes at a time when only through strong ethical convictions can we stop the EU going backwards. In any event, <strong>I ask that you promptly sign the <a href="https://www.change.org/p/musée-wiertz-parc-léopold-stop-aux-bureaux-et-à-la-privatisation-de-l-espace-public?recruiter=488719266&amp;utm_campaign=signature_receipt&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=share_petition">attached petition </a>against the dismantling of the Wiertz Museum.</strong> What a nice present it would be to start the year, if the European Parliament could grab this unique opportunity to use its huge budget (€1.8 billion) to finance a prestigious space for everyone, mixing European culture, democracy and the promotion of a district looking for recognition.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://brussels-express.eu/european-parliament-wiertz-museum-win-win-win-lose/">The European Parliament and the Wiertz Museum. Win-win or win-lose?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://brussels-express.eu">Brussels Express</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
